There has been a lot of interest in this site, especially with Lynn Redgrave about to make an appearance in Los Angeles with her one woman play “Nightingale”. I recently received an inquiry from a writer wanting to delve into my story and make a movie script. Another wanted to write a play. Yet another, ghost write a book for me! Well, I have to say that while I cannot claim copyright to ideas, the specifics of my story are, unfortunately, mine. And I am advised that I should post a notice. Here it is:
COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARE CLAIMED AND ARE HELD BY JOHN CLARK, WHERE HE IS THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THE ORIGINAL TEXT AND PHOTOGRAPHIC CONTENTS OF THIS SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE LOGO ON THE HOME PAGE WITH THE WORDS “JOHN CLARK’S PRO SE BLOGSITE” AND “SHOW BIZ MEETS THE LAW”.
THIS SITE IS INTENDED FOR STUDY AND USE BY STUDENTS AND OTHERS IN THE HOPE THAT IT WILL BENEFIT PEOPLE IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF LEGAL MATTERS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE UNREPRESENTED; AND BY THE PRESS AND OTHER MEDIA.
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE USE OF REASONABLE PARTS OF THE MATERIAL AND/OR TEXT AND/OR QUOTATIONS BY VISITORS TO THE SITE FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEW OR COMMENT ONLY, PROVIDED THAT PROPER ATTRIBUTION IS MADE AT THE SAME TIME, AND/OR A LINK IS PROVIDED TO THIS SITE.
IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED BY THE WRITER ARE FOUNDED UPON AND COLORED BY HIS OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCES AND BELIEFS.
JOHN CLARK BELIEVES IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH WITHIN LEGAL LIMITS, AND FOR THE RIGHT OF OPPOSING VOICES TO BE HEARD IN PUBLIC FORUMS.
COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARK 2004-2006
JOHN CLARK
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Monthly Archives: September 2006
COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK
Posted in Legal InfoCOPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARE CLAIMED AND ARE HELD BY THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THE ORIGINAL TEXT AND PHOTOGRAPHIC CONTENTS OF THIS SITE, INCLUDING BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE LOGO ON THE HOME PAGE, WITH WORDS “JOHN CLARK’S PRO SE BLOGSITE” AND “SHOW BIZ MEETS THE LAW”.
THIS SITE IS INTENDED FOR PERSONAL STUDY AND USE BY STUDENTS AND NON-PROFESSIONALS IN THE HOPE THAT IT WILL BENEFIT PEOPLE IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF LEGAL MATTERS.
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE USE OF REASONABLE PARTS OF THE MATERIAL AND/OR TEXT AND/OR QUOTATIONS BY VISITORS TO THE SITE FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEW OR COMMENT, PROVIDED THAT PROPER ATTRIBUTION IS MADE AT THE SAME TIME, AND/OR A LINK IS PROVIDED TO THIS SITE.
IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED BY THE WRITER ARE FOUNDED UPON AND COLORED BY HIS OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCES AND BELIEFS.
JOHN CLARK BELIEVES IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH WITHIN LEGAL LIMITS, AND FOR THE RIGHT OF OPPOSING VOICES TO BE HEARD IN PUBLIC FORUMS.
COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARK 2004-2006
JOHN CLARK
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
LOUISE ROUG in IRAQ?
Posted in Links to MediaI see that Louise, that Danish pastry of a journalist for the Los Angeles Times, is reporting key facts from Iraq in the trial of Saddam Hussein for war crimes.
I know her, of course, you’ve already seen how she handled my trial:
Sunday, April 4, 2001
Home Edition
Section: Southern California Living
Actress Lynn Redgrave was on the witness stand in Los Angeles, hating every minute of it. She was being questioned by her ex-husband in one of the nastiest Hollywood divorce trials in years. John Clark, acting as his own attorney, drew close to show her a document. Redgrave flinched. "Please, I would rather he didn’t," she implored the judge.
"I understand that sparks fly between you and Mr. Clark," Superior Court Judge Arnold Gold told her. "Just grit your teeth and answer his questions." …In court, Redgrave was demure and wore black. Clark was rumpled, often removing his jacket and complaining of the heat. . .
Today she reports from the scene in Iraq, the trial judge being Abdullah al-Amiri, a Shiite Muslim.
Well, here was a difference. At my trial, Saddam Hussein (as he came to be known around Los Angeles Family Court) sat on the bench, his other name being Arnold Gold.
That being said, she tells us that prosecuting attorney Munqith Faroon demanded on Wednesday that the judge step down after an outburst by the defendant the day before. He charged that the judge had shown bias in favor of the defendant by allowing him to use the courtroom as a bully pulpit.
Judge Amiri then made a statement that made sense, and rang loud and clear. He said "WE ARE ALL EQUAL IN FRONT OF THE LAW."
I wish. I wish he’d been my judge, our family court could use him.
However, at the end of the day, Louise had importantly failed. She failed to note whether or not the defendant’s attorney removed his jacket. Was he rumpled? Did he complain of the heat? It must be very hot in Iraq, do they have air conditioning? Did Saddam flinch when asked questions? Did he grit his teeth? Did he wear black? Was he demure?
Perhaps Louise’s problem was that she didn’t have the Times’s supervisor of gossip Gina Piccalo, or her ghost writer Ann O’Neill or the Calendar Editor (none of whom ever talked to me), standing behind her to give her a nudge. But I would bet that Louise’s blonde hair was impeccable.
A word in her ear from me. DON’T lose your head and try taking any of the witnesses out for lunch to gain their confidences, and later write against them in a biased manner. Because if you try it out there, well, they have their methods. Hint. They don’t go to court.
Which is “NEWS”?
Posted in COMMENTARY-Passing paradeThe first of these two items was filed by the A.P., and run by CNN “The Most Trusted Name In News” [or at least, that is, the news we can trust them to give us]
DISTRICT ATTORNEY: KARR’S CHAMPAGNE FLIGHT COST $6K
BOULDER, Colorado (AP) — The Boulder D.A.’s office on Thursday said it spent $23,656 investigating John Mark Karr.
The tab included nearly $6,000 for business class tickets to fly the former suspect in the JonBenet Ramsey case and an investigator back from Bangkok, Thailand.
An outline of expenses shows the 15-hour flight from Thailand, on which Karr sipped champagne, dined on fried king prawns and roast duck, cost the county $5,925.
[blah blah blah]
Now let’s check out what the Cincinnati Enquirer reported today, in the commencement of courtroom action to find justice for little Marcus Fiesel.
COUPLE’S DEFENSE LAWYERS BICKERING. DAVID CARROLL’S REP SAYS LIZ’S IS BAD-MOUTHING HIM
David Carroll Jr.’s attorney, Scott Rubenstein, says the attorney for his client’s wife and co-defendant is interfering with his work.
Rubenstein filed a motion in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court on Thursday asking the court’s presiding judge to stop Liz Carroll’s attorney, Adam Bleile, from interfering in his case. He also asked for an investigation into his actions.
[Blah blah]
Rubenstein was appointed by the Hamilton County Public Defender’s Office to represent David Carroll Jr., while Bleile was retained privately by Liz Carroll.
Bleile is accused of calling David Carroll Jr.’s mother, Debra Hounshell, in which he questioned the integrity of Rubenstein, the prosecutor, the judge and the proceedings in general.
[Blah]
Between Aug. 28 and Aug. 31, Hounshell wrote, Bleile called her several times and told her he was representing Liz Carroll for free; that Rubenstein, the prosecutor’s office and the judge were “all like family” and would work together to ensure that David Carroll Jr. would not get a fair trial; and that the attorneys were handpicked by the judge, so she should question their integrity.
Bleile said he is not working for free, but declined to comment further. She also wrote that Bleile told her he could recommend several attorneys who would take the case for free and he could arrange for the attorneys to contact her.
Hounshell added that Bleile “caused her to question the integrity of her son’s counsel, engendered great emotional distress and created a distraction to both her and (Rubenstein).”
Now I ask you, which item is of more concern to the public? The first is just stupid, to be ignored, but the second should be a cause for alarm, for it sets the beginning stage of the money grubbing trivialization of the issues. I hope this is a strong judge.
We can expect that the free appointed attorneys will be fired by their respective clients, who will then hire powerful free attorneys looking for professional credits, and maybe a book deal. Followed by jury members on the same track. So, if/when the media starts to spotlight the case – which cannot be before the trial starts – will it be just a question of time before Gloria Allred shows up? The one obstacle to this scenario is that there is not a single participant to the drama who could by any stretch be called “sympathetic”. The only one of those is dead.
Both stories should have a notice attached.
CAUTION: LAWYERS AT PLAY
IDENTITIES FOR SALE
Posted in COMMENTARY-Passing paradeYes, you heard it right. This is not identity THEFT.
It’s done for Celebrities, who willingly pay a lot of money to professional writers on condition they remain anonymous.
They’re called “Ghosts”.
You would be forgiven if you thought that the best-selling book “Fatherhood” was written by Bill Cosby. You’d be wrong. It was written by Ralph Schoenstein. He was quite a guy.
He also wrote “Time Flies” for Bill, published in 1988. And he wrote “Here’s Johnny!” for Ed McMahon, published just last year, and which Ed is busy promoting on the usual circuit as we speak.
The thing is, if you bought any of these books, you would not find his name appearing anywhere. I guess that does add a premium to his take-home, because otherwise he’d be a lesser paid “co-writer”.
Autobiographies make big money for their celebrity subjects for very little work, they just have to sit still for a few hours, as though having their portraits painted, and mouth off.
As for Ralph, sorry to report that he died last week. Perhaps his headstone will remain blank too.
Vanessa Redgrave Replaces Lynn
Posted in Links to Media, LYNN REDGRAVETucked away on page 4 of today’s L.A. Times entertainment section, Mike Boehm reports that Lynn’s sister Vanessa will be taking over in Lynn’s one woman show, “Nightingale” at the Mark Taper Forum next month.
I was hoping that Lynn’s appearance locally would mean that she would be able to appear in LA Family court, so that we could wrap up some outstanding matters in her lawsuit against me, filed in 1999. After the trial she fled California with our children and took up residence in Connecticut, where she and they have stayed hidden ever since.
Oh well, at least the audience will be treated to a fresh interpretation of the play, which deals with their maternal grandmother Beatrice. And maybe it will sell more tickets. But this news rated a mention on page 1, surely.
Sept. 9 update
Today’s L.A. Times printed a correction. It said, in full,
“”Nightingale”: An article in Tuesday’s Calendar section about an effort to entice new theatergoers with free tickets to more than 50 shows on Oct. 19 said Vanessa Redgrave was the star of “Nightingale” at the Mark Taper Forum. The play features Lynn…
So now I was really confused. To me that says not only will the play be STARRING Vanessa, but it will also be FEATURING Lynn (yeah, in the hierarchy of showbiz billing, there’s a difference…)
I called the box office, and was assured that Vanessa Redgrave will NOT be in it, so I’m passing it on.
Wonder if the LA Times has ever printed a correction of a correction.
WHAT’S IN A NAME?
Posted in COMMENTARY-Passing paradeMARCUS. Think about it. Anything hidden? What can you find?
I changed the “C” to a “K”, then I separated the syllables.
I came up with MARK US. Can this be his statement from beyond the grave? I know that sounds eerie, weird even, but I want to believe that it is.
What that says to me is that he had a destiny and a role to play in his short life, much as Terri Schiavo had a destiny and a role to play in her life (which I’ve gone into extensively elsewhere.)
The death and life of Marcus, much like Terri, bookended within its boundaries a message for all of us, about the plight of the helpless and the unrepresented and the unprotected and the defenseless and the dispossessed and the abandoned.
There was a play by J.B. Priestley about such a person, a girl who was so helpless she killed herself. I was in it once. He called it “An Inspector Calls” (the inspector was played by Sir Cedric Hardwicke in my production). It dealt with how, in the death of this person (she too was not a relative, but a worker for a family), every person who knew her denied involvement in her death. And Priestley set out to show how it was NOT so. How everyone she knew was very much a part of her death.
And so it is with Marcus – and Terri – and the society in which we live. We all had a part in it, and it is for all of us, in our quiet moments when we look inward instead of outward, to examine our consciences. Where does our responsibility lie? Is there anything we could have done that we didn’t do, or did NOT do that we could or should have done?
Most people are on the fringes of involvement, and shrug off true involvement by volunteering money or labor to charitable causes because it makes them feel better. Among those that are not, that work and interact daily in the front line, are the lawyers and the judges and the justices. They are the ones who can actually, with rigorous determination, DO something. And the final determinant of whether they are effective and fair is to be found among the legions of their “victims”, a word I choose to use with some insight based upon my experiences with the non-criminal courts. They are the truly abandoned ones.
The idea of the feeling of abandonment is something that has haunted me all my life, ever since I was left in an English boarding school hundreds of miles from my parents and my London home without the capacity to understand that they were helpless to do otherwise due to the blitz and the war in Europe (the fate of wartime evacuees in England in ’39/40, deep into mass enuresis, and a circumstance that was stupidly ignored by the makers of The Chronicles of Narnia that could have set up the movie and given the escapism some meaning.)
Little three year old Marcus was REALLY, LITERALLY, abandoned. Much worse, he was left in isolation, hands bound behind his back, only the sounds of people and traffic outside, a whirring fan, unbearable crushing heat, hunger, and thirst. Truly forsaken, with no power to consider the meaning of his fate because of his age. Just raw suffering and sheer terror. And with his last gasp, came his merciful death.
We cannot ignore the message, HIS message. DO something for some helpless ones, big and little; don’t just TALK about it. We need to let him know that we hear him, hear his cry, which speaks to us like the ghost of Hamlet’s father.